The 112(f) Presumption Still Has Meaning: Zeroclick, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

By Sarah Myhrom Eisenman, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Recovering foreign lost profits: WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.

By Joseph W. Bauer, Summer Associate

Summary:

Read More

Claiming Benefit and Priority in Large Patent Families

By Carl G. Peterson, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Drafting and Prosecution Strategies in View of the USPTO Broadest Reasonable Interpretation (BRI) Standard

By Ambar Nayate and Al VredeveldShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corporation: Subject Matter Eligibility on Motion

By Brian WelleShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Obviousness and the “Secondary” Considerations: Novartis v. Torrent

By Adrian SanchezShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Do “Processor” and “Controller” Invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112(f)? Ensuring structural support for arguably means plus function limitations

By Ambar Nayate, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Stating the Obvious: Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

By Sarah Myhrom EisenmanShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Revisions to Patent Examination Guidelines in China

By Al W. VredeveldShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Claim Drafting to Support Latent Infringement

By Carl G. PetersonShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Pages